Solutions · Argus AI

AI assistant testing for Telecom

AI assistant testing for telecom. Operators handle millions of subscriber interactions across Azerbaijani and Russian, under service-quality SLAs.

Automated AI Validation for High-Volume Telecom Operations

Telecom operators manage millions of subscriber interactions across Azerbaijani and Russian languages while adhering to strict service-quality SLAs. To maintain these standards, Allmaz provides a specialized testing engine integrated within the Argus self-hosted platform. This engine operates alongside QA and pentest capabilities under a single console and sign-in, allowing operators to select their preferred judge model within the global settings to ensure consistent quality control across all AI deployments. The platform is designed to safeguard the customer experience by simulating the complexities of a real-world subscriber base. By generating thousands of realistic synthetic users and applying adversarial personas, the engine identifies critical failure points—such as prompt-injection or linguistic contradictions—before they impact the end user. This rigorous validation process ensures that AI assistants remain compliant, safe, and effective, reducing churn risks and maintaining operational excellence in high-pressure contact-center environments.

Capabilities

Solving Telecom-Specific AI Challenges

✓

Mitigate churn by ensuring consistent, high-quality subscriber interactions across all touchpoints

✓

Validate performance and linguistic fluidity across mixed Azerbaijani and Russian conversations

✓

Maintain service-quality SLAs through automated, native-language accuracy and safety scoring

✓

Stress-test assistants against realistic, high-volume subscriber behaviors and adversarial personas

✓

Identify vulnerabilities and prompt-injection risks before they impact the customer experience

✓

Establish a permanent audit trail with write-once assurance records and regression suites

Enterprise-Grade Testing Capabilities

Synthetic Azerbaijani User Generation

Generates thousands of realistic synthetic users, each with a specific role, goal, language, style, knowledge level, and behavior to simulate diverse subscriber bases.

Adversarial Persona Testing

Prioritizes difficult scenarios including frustration, contradiction, prompt-injection, manipulation, and AZ↔RU code-switching to find breaking points.

Native LLM Judging

An Azerbaijani-native LLM judge scores the assistant on accuracy, tone, formality, compliance, and safety.

Black-Box Integration

Tests the assistant exactly as a customer would via REST, Dify, Kommunicate, or browser automation connectors.

Policy-Driven Expectations

Derives expected behaviors from your uploaded knowledge and policy documents, allowing for human overrides of proposed expectations.

The Validation Process

1Connect your AI assistant as a black box via a supported connector.
2Upload knowledge and policy documents to define expected behaviors.
3Deploy synthetic users and adversarial personas to simulate subscriber interactions.
4The Azerbaijani-native LLM judge scores responses for compliance and accuracy.
5Review the readiness score, detailed findings, and write-once assurance records.
6Run regression suites to confirm that previously identified issues remain fixed.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the platform handle the mix of Azerbaijani and Russian languages?

The engine specifically tests for AZ↔RU code-switching and utilizes an Azerbaijani-native LLM judge to ensure linguistic accuracy, tone, and formality.

Will the testing process crash my production assistant?

No. Per-assistant concurrency is strictly bounded to ensure that testing the assistant does not become a denial-of-service attack on your system.

Is the readiness score a definitive release gate?

The readiness score is intended as a signal rather than a release gate, as the judge does not yet have a published agreement measurement against human reviewers.

How is the testing environment and configuration managed?

The engine is part of Argus, a self-hosted platform sharing a single deployment with QA and pentest engines. Each run snapshots its evaluator configuration at launch, ensuring finished runs are never re-scored against models chosen after the fact.

How are the 'expected behaviors' determined during testing?

Expected behaviors are derived from your uploaded knowledge and policy documents. These derived expectations are treated as proposals that remain human-overridable rather than final verdicts.

Ensure Your AI is Telecom-Ready

Secure your subscriber experience and maintain your SLAs with automated, adversarial AI testing.

Request a demo