A requirement becomes an exclusion rule only after a human confirms it, and missing information surfaces as a gap rather than a silent rejection.
An automated exclusion is invisible when it is wrong — the supplier who should have been invited simply never appears, and nobody knows to look. SpiderNet requires a person to confirm which requirements are genuinely mandatory before any of them can exclude anyone, and treats unknown information as a gap to investigate rather than grounds for rejection.
A requirement excludes only after human confirmation.
Unknown information surfaces as a gap, never a silent exclusion.
Mandatory criteria sit outside the weighted score.
Qualification status is separate from relevance.
No supplier disappears without a recorded reason.
No. Autonomous exclusion without human-confirmed mandatory criteria is explicitly out of scope.
It surfaces as a gap for someone to check, rather than counting against the supplier silently.
No — they sit outside the weighted score and determine qualification status only.
Extracts each requirement from the SOW with its type, importance and a citation to the page.
Specialised agents widen the candidate pool beyond the suppliers you already know.
Every material attribute carries its source, date, method, confidence and verification status.
Five separate matching layers, and every score opens onto its evidence.
See the complete product: problem, features, how it works and deployment.
Request a demo to turn a real statement of work into an evidence-backed supplier shortlist.